Nuclear News: International physicians group calls for ban on uranium mining

Beyond Nuclear: International physicians group calls for ban on uranium mining
‘The International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) adopted a resolution at its International Council meeting on Sunday in Basel, Switzerland, calling for a ban on uranium mining and the production of yellowcake (uranium oxide). The resolution described both processes as “irresponsible” and “a grave threat to health and to the environment”. The resolution also describes uranium mining and yellowcake production as a “violation of human rights”. The right to life, liberty and security, to physical integrity, self-determination, the protection of human dignity, the right to clean water are just some of the rights that are afflicted by uranium mining and its processes, say the doctors.’

RTTNews: Japan Imposes Fresh Sanctions On Iran Over Nuclear Program
‘Japan on Friday slapped additional sanctions on Iran over its disputed nuclear program, reports said. The latest round of sanctions will freeze assets of Iranian nationals linked to the country’s nuclear program. They are also meant to keep a tighter watch over financial transactions of the Islamic Republic. Significantly, Tokyo did not impose any restriction on oil imports from Tehran which account for ten per cent of its total energy requirements. Iran is the fourth-biggest supplier of oil to Japan after Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Qatar.’

The Economist: Nuclear power? Um, maybe
‘WHEN Angela Merkel cares about an issue she does not give a speech. Instead, she hits the road. Lately Germany’s chancellor has travelled to a wind park in Mecklenburg-West Pomerania, a nuclear reactor in Lower Saxony, and an energy-generating house in Hesse. Aiming to draw attention to Germany’s dilemmas in deciding how much and what sort of power to produce and consume in the coming decades, Mrs Merkel will bundle her answers into a comprehensive “energy concept”, to be unveiled at the end of September. This is like coming up with a menu that pleases both carnivores and herbivores. Much of the debate revolves around whether to scrap a plan devised by an earlier government to cease nuclear-power generation by 2022. The decision will affect Mrs Merkel’s political standing and the public finances, as well as Germany’s energy future. With roughly a quarter of generation capacity due to reach retirement age by 2020, decisions made now will shape the energy profile of Europe’s biggest economy for years. There is “a window of opportunity for good changes or for messing up the situation for the next 50 years,” says Olav Hohmeyer, an economist at the University of Flensburg.’

Prague Daily Monitor: Activists criticise Temel

Nuclear Myths and Facts #4: Nuclear plants can’t be built fast enough

The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) has published a document called ‘Myths & Facts About Nuclear Energy’. The NEI – ‘the policy organization of the nuclear energy and technologies industry and participates in both the national and global policy-making process’ – describes the document as a collection of ‘Synopses of Common Myths About Nuclear Energy and Corresponding Facts That Refute Them’.

In this series of posts we’re presenting some Corresponding Facts of Our Own That Refute the NEI’s Corresponding Facts.

The ‘Myth’: Nuclear plants can’t be built fast enough.

NEI’s ‘Fact’: In just 19 years, between 1970 and 1989, 105 nuclear energy plants were constructed and put into service in the United States. The current licensing and construction of new nuclear plants will take 8-10 years, which is comparable to similar sized electricity sources. The timeline is expected to shorten to six years or less with licensing and construction experience. Building new nuclear plants will create thousands of non-exportable jobs, help revitalize the U.S. manufacturing sector, and positively affect the U.S. economy and the environment.

Let’s face it – when it comes to climate change, we’re in a race against time. Global emissions of climate change gases must peak and fall as soon as possible. Can nuclear power do that and in time?

In a word: No.

The UK Met Office (UKMO) said last year that it would be almost impossible to keep the global temperature rise under 2 degrees centrigrade, unless global carbon emissions peak before 2020. The first few new nuclear reactors the NEI is calling for will only be coming online then (and that’s if things go to the very optimistic plan and any delays are avoided). In other words, those reactors will arrive much too late to fight a battle that needs to be won in the next ten years. Nuclear plants can’t be built fast enough.

And even if we get a massive expansion in nuclear power, its contribution to cutting global carbon emissions is small. The Energy Technology Perspectives 2008 report produced by the International Energy Agency in 2008 shows that, even if existing world nuclear power capacity could be quadrupled by 2050, its share of world energy consumption would still be below 10%. This would reduce carbon dioxide emissions by just 6% compared to the 21% reduction from renewable energy sources and the 54% from various electricity and fuel efficiency measures (see page 41 of the report).

The point is this: we don’t have the time to wait until 2020 or 2050. Safe and clean renewable energy sources and energy efficiency programmes are ready to go right now. As we say in one of our nuclear briefings: Nuclear power is a dangerous waste of time.

Read more here:
Nuclear Myths and Facts #4: Nuclear plants can’t be built fast enough

GVN :: Dialogue | Nuclear_Disarmament (part2)

Engineering: Monitoring Well Design, Installation, and Documentation at Hazardous Toxic, and Radioactive Waste HTRW Sites: Reference Manual on CD-ROM by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USACE

  • United States Army Corps of Engineers
  • Public Domain Document
  • Adobe PDF Format
  • EM 1110-1-4000
  • Pages: 68 – Date: November 1, 1998

Product Description
This Engineer Manual (EM) provides geotechnical and chemical guidelines for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) elements in the planning, installing, and reporting of soil and/or bedrock borings, monitoring wells, and other geotechnical and geochemical devices at hazardous, toxic, and radioactive waste (HTRW) sites. These guidelines are a compilation of those procedures necessary for the acquisition of environmentally representative geotechnical data and samples, u… More >>

Engineering: Monitoring Well Design, Installation, and Documentation at Hazardous Toxic, and Radioactive Waste HTRW Sites: Reference Manual on CD-ROM by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USACE

Killer Traffic Generation Strategies Revealed – Traffic Treasury

75% commission on every sale! :: Virtually Unlimited Traffic:: Hungry and never-dying market. :: Free resources for affiliates at: http://www.traffictreasuryonline.com/affiliates.ht ml
Killer Traffic Generation Strategies Revealed – Traffic Treasury

Robot inside Chernobyls Sarcophagus – Робот в Чернобыльском Саркофаге

Used Nuclear Fuel Radiation Safety

Chernobyl 2007 HD

Safe nuclear dump discovered

What McCain didn’t say in his speech on foreign policy